Re: [Foundation-l] Funding for the newly elected Board Members
Delirium <delirium-88qmZGEba/[email protected]> Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:48:40 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.wikimedia.legal |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Delirium wrote: > [email protected] wrote: > >> I know that the Wikimedia is currently strapped for cash. However, I >> would like to propose that we cover certain key expenses for our >> elected board members relating to their participation in Wikimedia >> work. For instance, telephone calls overseas should be covered by the >> Foundation, and not the elected representatives. A broadband >> connection should be covered by the Foundation as well. >> >> While every participant is doing their work on Wikipedia and the >> other projects voluntarily, Ant and Angela are expected to represent >> us, the users. We should make it as easy for them as possible. > > > I wouldn't consider this a high priority---certainly far below buying > servers, which we already don't have enough money to buy. Unless we > find ourselves in a situation where we have so much cash we don't have > any place it could better be spent, I think a better approach would be > to simply use email to communicate like everyone else does. As for > internet connections, I assume anyone involved in the project already > has one (how else would they be Wikipedians, given that this is > primarily an internet-based project?). Adding a qualification to this: I wouldn't be opposed to voluntary donations by people who feel strongly about this. If there are expenses that are turning out to be problematic, there could be a fund-raising campaign to provide funding for the board members. But this should come out of specific donations for that purpose: people should know they're donating specifically to the "Wikimedia board of trustees communication and travel fund" or something. This is something I feel somewhat strongly about, especially since someone mentioned how other organizations routinely do it: they are most definitely not models to emulate. A great many non-profit organizations are inefficient, wasteful, and often simply corrupt, with a relatively small percentage of their money going towards their actual stated mission. -Mark