Re: [Foundation-l] Re: Funding for the newly elected Board Members
Daniel Mayer <maveric149-/[email protected]> Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.wikimedia.legal,gmane.org.wikimedia.foundation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Anthere <anthere9-/[email protected]> wrote: > Last evening, we were discussing of how much money was currently in bank. > I made a quick estimate, because Mav in on holidays, so I could not ask > him last numbers, but basically I know that mid may we had roughly 5.400 > dollars. Add to this the 9000 dollars refund for a server. Plus 10.000 > euros received a few days ago by Jimbo for the trophy. > > That makes about 24 000 dollars (it is a *very* rough estimate). The figure I have on http://wikimediafoundation.org/fundraising is US$9,054.63 as of June 18. That figure does *not* include the ~US$9000 server refund and it does *not* include the ArsElectronica award money. So your estimate, if anything, is low by a few thousand dollars. I will update the numbers as soon as I get exact figures from Jimbo. > JeLuF made a provisional hardware budget for the rest of the year. > You may find it here : > http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_provisional_budget > Current amount indicated is 12000 dollars This is helpful, but the dollar figure looks to be way too optimistic given our non-linear growth rate. > .... > I would say that we should plan a fund raising time in fall. It will be > necessary. But saying we do not have enough money right now is just > plain incorrect. We should have one sooner. In fact we should have one *each* quarter of the year. > Absolutely. It is very important that people know how their money is > spent. I deeply agree. And we know that donations were done to purchase > *hardware*, because most donations were sent while wiki was broken, and > we made a general call precisely to have new hardware, so no money > donated to pay for server should be used for any other means. This is an > essential point, and I really wish that no one have any doubts about that. It would be trivial for me to track the ArsElectronica money separately so that it could be used for non-server expenses. In future fund drives we would say up front the exact maximum percentage non-server expenses (overhead) would take up of the general fund budget. Thus fund drives would be best launched right after a quarterly board meeting. The coming fund drive and revising the budget would be very important topics for that meeting. > We provide right now transparent money use history. Mav has been > maintaining this for a while now. See > > http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_bank_account_history_for_2004 Which reminds me that I need more bank statements from Jimbo. > I think that in the future, we may ask members to indicate if they wish > that their money is used for a specific purpose. Till now, the two > specific purposes were > * hardware > * purchase of a computer for Brion We just need to be upfront as to how exactly the money is spent. Ergo, we need a living budget that is adhered to (my main election platform, BTW). > I see many more. Especially for firms funding. A firm or an organisation > may wish that the donation money is used in a specific way, such as > support of a minority language, or sending computers with wikipedia on > it to an given african country, or making a whole set of wikireaders > around a specific topic. There are many options and to my opinion, > donators should have the possibility to indicate what they want the > money to be used for. For individual donors, we could have three separate PayPal/MoneyBookers accounts to choose from: 1) general fund (pays for server-related expenses and basic foundation expenses which would not exceed 10%) 2) developer fund (pays bounties to developers to fix certain things in MediaWiki) 3) legal defense fund (pays the expenses of pro-bono legal council) > Aside from donations, we also recently received an award (10 000 euros), > and the money from this award may be used the way we choose to use it. > Which mean, we can use it for hardware, or for *anything else*, > including to support costs which will help to build the community. Or to reimburse the travel costs of board members who attend meetings. -- Daniel Mayer (aka mav) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com