[Foundation-l] Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Anthere <anthere9-/[email protected]> Fri, 9 Jul 2004 00:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.wikimedia.legal |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20040709070152.75300.qmail__31780.4371974946$1089356536$gmane$org@web41810.mail.yahoo.com> |
This problem with the adress wikilegal-l being inserted in some messages has been going on for a while now; It is a problem with gname, and I have no idea how to fix it. I just know that it makes all those prefixed messages refused by the mailing list system. I suggested that those still posting to wikilegal-l remove the adress from their mails, and only post to foundation-l, so that it does not break the gname system. But ... :-( Would anyone caring for mailing list has an idea how to fix this problem ? ----- my answer to Michael is at the end of this message :-) ant --- Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON-f4n82jGjeJOzKZ/[email protected]> wrote: > Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 06:11:37 +0000 (UTC) > From: MAILER-DAEMON-f4n82jGjeJOzKZ/[email protected] (Mail > Delivery System) > Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender > To: gowl-wikilegal-l-x7+yCfqV/[email protected] > > This is the Postfix program at host > mail.wikimedia.org. > > I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message > returned > below could not be delivered to one or more > destinations. > > For further assistance, please send mail to > <postmaster> > > If you do so, please include this problem report. > You can > delete your own text from the message returned > below. > > The Postfix program > > <[email protected]>: unknown user: > "wikilegal-l" > > ATTACHMENT part 2 message/delivery-status > ATTACHMENT part 3 message/rfc822 > To: [email protected] > From: Anthere <anthere9-/[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Re: NEH grant > Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 08:13:05 +0200 > CC: [email protected] > > > > Michael Snow wrote: > > Anthere wrote: > > > >> Christopher Mahan wrote: > >> > >>> I too wish to express my misgivings at getting > the grant. There's > >>> always strings attached, and targets have to be > met, and so on. Who's > >>> gonna run it? Who's gonna keep track of the > money, the milestones, > >>> etc... > >>> > >>> I would rather mav publish a monthly budget and > post that to the > >>> front page, like this: > >>> > >>> This month, we need $4000 to meet expenses. So > far, users have > >>> contributed $2800. Thank you! > >>> > >>> If budget is met, then you write: > >>> This month's budget has been met. Thank you! > >>> > >>> > >>> It needs to be updated daily. > >> > >> > >> I strongly disagree with this. > >> A budget is not something you balance week per > week or even month per > >> month. We must plan it. In advance. A budget is > something you have to > >> organise, to take into account structural needs, > contingencies, and > >> see how to best use the remaining. > > > > > > With respect to budgets, and also with respect to > the financial > > management involved in running a grant, Anthere is > quite right. The > > people who have to do the actual work cannot get > the job done if they > > have to spend half or more of their time keeping > everyone constantly > > updated on what they're doing. > > > > However, it would be nice to see more frequent > updates just about > > fundraising progress, which is what this > suggestion focuses on. > > I agree. > This is planned to be on the new fundation website, > as part of the > feedback the organisation can provide donors. > > For more information about the new website content, > see > http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_website > > Please add to the page :-) > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail