Re: Extension:AllBooks
"Andrew Whitworth" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.wikimedia.textbook |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Simetrical <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Andrew Whitworth <[email protected]> wrote: > > Content from a sub-page is not logically different from the content of > > the book's base page. > > Of course they are. Otherwise you wouldn't want to list and count it > separately. If you prefer, the book *page* is logically different > from the book's *subpages*, even if their respective contents may not > be logically much different. We're not interested in counting the individual pages (although I suspect that's one of the easiest ways to go about this), we're interested in counting groups of pages with the same prefix name. Logically, it doesn't matter whether a particular page is named "Bookname" or "Bookname/Subpagename". Consider a book with slashes in the title, like "P/L programming". We wouldn't have a page named "P" at all to be counted, but "P/" still serves as a unique prefix for all pages in that book. Or the book we had about Oracle, which until just recently didn't have a base page at all, there were [[Oracle/Contents]] and [[Oracle/Cheatsheet]], but no [[Oracle]]. What we are after here is a simple count, a single integer value that is probably in the neighborhood of 3000-4000 for en.wikibooks, and is significantly lower for most other wikibooks or wikiversity projects (since wikiversity is likely to want a feature like this too). Massive across-the-board reorganization of the entire project is simply not an acceptable solution for this problem. We would also like a listing of books, although most of our books are already well-categorized, and we can obtain mostly-accurate lists from these categories (although it would be nice to know which "books" are not properly categorized, that's a small issue). Consider that a solution from our point of view is to create two bots: 1) Bot 1 makes repeated calls to api?action=query?list=allpages to download the complete wikibooks page list. 2) Bot 2 applies a simple regex to that page list, counts the number of unique prefixes. Posts an edit to the page [[Template:NUMBEROFBOOKS]] with that number, and posts an edit to [[Wikibooks:List of all books]] with the complete list. I doubt this would be an ideal solution, but it would give us exactly what we want. > An alternative approach to fix the problem would be to improve support > for subpages. This is, from a software point of view, a path of > greater resistance, since namespaces are already well-distinguished > and subpages are not. It would have to be thought out very carefully. > One thing that occurs to me is that theoretically, it doesn't have to > be set in stone that different namespaces correspond to different > colon-delimited prefixes. Hypothetically one could have "Book" in the > main namespace and "Book/subpage" in another namespace, even though > they have the same prefix. But this would require a considerable > amount of effort to implement. Again, measure the amount of implementation effort against the desired goal. All we want is a single integer value. A massive programming effort is no more desired on our end then a massive reorganization of our books. > Wikibooks is, comparatively, in the excellent > position that if anyone wanted to become a developer, they could > fairly easily become one, code up any features that they wanted, and > have them incorporated into the main product without having to > maintain hacks. This is exactly what we are trying to do. Ramac is trying to code this feature up as an extension and have it added for Wikibooks. > Only if > a feature is intrinsically of very narrow interest should it be put in > an extension. I would venture to guess that this feature is of particularly narrow interest. I can only imagine that, based on the way I know other projects to handle naming, only Wikibooks and possibly Wikiversity would use it. Hence, the extension. --Andrew Whitworth