Re: GFDL licensed books better for Wikibooks orWikisource? (or nowhere?)

This is best for Wikibooks, I think. Are you offering to help bring it over?
*nudge nudge*

This is definitely a textbook, and is also of the type that would benefit
from being kept up-to-date. I notice the author has included links to
Wikipedia in the appropriate places.

I don't want to say "this will be a project for me to do" because it won't
(at least in the near future). But this should be a project for someone.

Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: textbook-l-bounces-RusutVdil2icGmH+5r0DM0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
[mailto:textbook-l-bounces-RusutVdil2icGmH+5r0DM0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Brianna Laugher
Sent: June 12, 2008 10:36 PM
To: Wikimedia textbook discussion
Subject: [Textbook-l] GFDL licensed books better for Wikibooks orWikisource?
(or nowhere?)

I just discovered <http://www.indiana.edu/%7Ehlw/index.html> How
Language Works (edition 3.0) by Michael Gasser. It's GFDL.

I guess if it was at Wikisource it would be in a more archivey way,
whereas at Wikibooks you would hope people would continue to develop
it... is that about right?

cheers
Brianna

-- 
They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment:
http://modernthings.org/

_______________________________________________
Textbook-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/textbook-l