Re: PDF/Collection feature live on de.wikibooks

"Mike.lifeguard" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.wikimedia.textbook
Message-ID <[email protected]>
And also why free content is preferred to be on Commons in the first
place.


On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:27:39 +0200, "Derbeth" <[email protected]> said:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:22:49 +0200, Erik Moeller wrote:
> 
> >> Secondly, current version of the tool does a plagiarism - beacause it does not mention
> >> image authors and does not provide any mean (like by making images clickable) to check
> >> these authors.
> >
> > Ouch, thanks for pointing that out. Tricky to do this automatically
> > since it's all wiki-text with templates, but we'll investigate a
> > solution here.
> 
> Fortunately most images on Commons use {{Information}} template; in other
> cases it would be quite reasonable to simply assume, that names from
> links to User: namespace in image description are names of the authors.
> 
> That's a good example why it's so important to follow standards on
> Commons.
> 
> -- 
> http://pl.wikipedia.org - otwarta encyklopedia
> http://pl.wikinews.org - otwarte źródło informacji
> http://pl.wikibooks.org - otwarte podręczniki
> 
> Opera - the fastest browser on Earth!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Textbook-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/textbook-l
-- 
  Mike.lifeguard
  [email protected]


_______________________________________________
Textbook-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/textbook-l
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.