Re: GFDL 1.3 released

Well, we should use the newest version regardless whether we want to
take the relicensing route (which I think we do) -- someone should
update [[WB:GFDL]].

-Mike


On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:40:17 -0500, "Andrew Whitworth"
<[email protected]> said:
> This is excellent news, especially for those of us who have been
> wishing for license migration for some time now. We all obviously need
> to take some time to read over the new version of the license, but if
> it's everything we had hoped for, we should probably update 'books to
> use this new license instead of the old 1.2 version.
> 
> Maybe we should post a copy of the new license at [[b:Wikibooks:GFDL
> Version 1.3]] and open up a discussion on the wiki
> 
> 
> --Andrew Whitworth
> 
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Mike.lifeguard
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > For those who aren't on foundation-l, news has arrived that the
> > GFDL 1.3 was released, containing the relicensing clause which
> > could allow us to move to CC-by-sa-3.0
> > My general impression has been that we think this is a good
> > thing, and we would discuss it if/when the option arrived. So,
> > let's start thinking about this some more. I suggest reading the
> > new bits of the license, the FAQ and perhaps reviewing some
> > comments on foundation-l if you need background.
> > I look forward to some fruitful discussion.
> > -Mike
> > ----
> >  Mike.lifeguard
> >  [email protected]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Textbook-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/textbook-l
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Textbook-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/textbook-l
----
  Mike.lifeguard
  [email protected]