Re: Wikibook User Arbitration
"Stanley \"Toshmann\" Ozoemena" <stanleyozoemena-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.wikimedia.textbook |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for the information, Dragontamer! --- percy tiglao <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/4/07, Robert Scott Horning > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have lothed the day that this would be > necessary, but Wikibooks has > > now gone to a formal user arbitration situation. > > > > For details, see: > > > > > http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:Arbitration/Panic2k4_vs._SBJohnny > > > > I have agreeed to step in here in terms of trying > to resolve this > > situation. Panic hasn't been doing blatant > vandalism, but he has been > > making it tough (apparently) to edit the C++ > Programming Wikibook and > > has made a few enemies and a few others who are > upset over his editorial > > style. > > > > In an attempt to formalize this discussion and try > to bring some order > > here, and to keep this from spilling into areas > like policy pages to > > legislate the behavior of Panic out of existance, > this has really turned > > into a judicial situation instead. Both that, and > this situation is > > quickly approaching the level of blatant wheel > warring, and I want to > > nip that right away to keep it from happening. > > > > Yes, this is perhaps a little more complicated > than the Wikipedia > > arbitration. OK, that is intentional in this > situation, as I would like > > to set this up in such a way that you don't want > to go through this meat > > grinder if at all possible. Arbitration is > clearly the last and final > > resort beyond trying to pull in people from > outside of the project to > > make very arbitrary decisions based on very > incomplete information. I > > certainly don't want to see Jimbo, Anthere, or > Erik having to get > > involved here being pressured to act when they > won't know what is going > > on in the first place. I know I have had to ask > around a bit and work > > hard to even see if there is a case to be made > here at all. > > > > It is my hope that these arbitration/mediation > cases are very, very > > rare. I'm trying hard to stay objective here as > well, and am leaving > > most of what is said to the discussion pages > above. > > > > Once all of this has been more or less resolved, I > hope that we can come > > up with the formal arbitration guidelines that > have been discussed now > > for more than a year on Wikibooks. I guess that > until a situation like > > this came up, there wasn't a percieved need to get > this put together. > > *Sigh* it was only a matter of time. Get a bunch of > people working > together, and people will suddenly not want to work > together for > whatever reason :-/ > > I have not looked at the current issue (in fact, > this is the first > time I have heard of it. But I feel that in this > specific case, > community consensus may be a bad thing. Eventually, > there may be > groups of users vs other groups of users. Maybe > Jimbo or some other > person would have to step in there. > > Oy, this is a whole new can-o-worms in Wikibooks > policy... > > --Dragontamer > _______________________________________________ > Textbook-l mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/textbook-l > namespace Stanoz { /* ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ How do you think Bill Gates got rich? By being the smartest programmer in the world? Or by owning the right to the work-product of other programmers? Your guess, I guess, is just as good as mine. (Never mind...) ************************************************************ Stanley Ozoemena STANOZ Computers (Nig.) Ltd. 20, Wetheral Rd., Owerri. Imo State. www.stanoz.com 0803 66 77 521 083 232010 ...er, from outside of my Nigeria; that'll be +234 803 667 7521 +234 83 232010 Peace and Love. ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ */ } __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com