Re: Wikibook User Arbitration

"Stanley \"Toshmann\" Ozoemena" <stanleyozoemena-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.wikimedia.textbook
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks for the information, Dragontamer!


--- percy tiglao <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 1/4/07, Robert Scott Horning
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I have lothed the day that this would be
> necessary, but Wikibooks has
> > now gone to a formal user arbitration situation.
> >
> > For details, see:
> >
> >
>
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:Arbitration/Panic2k4_vs._SBJohnny
> >
> > I have agreeed to step in here in terms of trying
> to resolve this
> > situation.  Panic hasn't been doing blatant
> vandalism, but he has been
> > making it tough (apparently) to edit the C++
> Programming Wikibook and
> > has made a few enemies and a few others who are
> upset over his editorial
> > style.
> >
> > In an attempt to formalize this discussion and try
> to bring some order
> > here, and to keep this from spilling into areas
> like policy pages to
> > legislate the behavior of Panic out of existance,
> this has really turned
> > into a judicial situation instead.  Both that, and
> this situation is
> > quickly approaching the level of blatant wheel
> warring, and I want to
> > nip that right away to keep it from happening.
> >
> > Yes, this is perhaps a little more complicated
> than the Wikipedia
> > arbitration.  OK, that is intentional in this
> situation, as I would like
> > to set this up in such a way that you don't want
> to go through this meat
> > grinder if at all possible.  Arbitration is
> clearly the last and final
> > resort beyond trying to pull in people from
> outside of the project to
> > make very arbitrary decisions based on very
> incomplete information.  I
> > certainly don't want to see Jimbo, Anthere, or
> Erik having to get
> > involved here being pressured to act when they
> won't know what is going
> > on in the first place.  I know I have had to ask
> around a bit and work
> > hard to even see if there is a case to be made
> here at all.
> >
> > It is my hope that these arbitration/mediation
> cases are very, very
> > rare.  I'm trying hard to stay objective here as
> well, and am leaving
> > most of what is said to the discussion pages
> above.
> >
> > Once all of this has been more or less resolved, I
> hope that we can come
> > up with the formal arbitration guidelines that
> have been discussed now
> > for more than a year on Wikibooks.  I guess that
> until a situation like
> > this came up, there wasn't a percieved need to get
> this put together.
> 
> *Sigh* it was only a matter of time. Get a bunch of
> people working
> together, and people will suddenly not want to work
> together for
> whatever reason :-/
> 
> I have not looked at the current issue (in fact,
> this is the first
> time I have heard of it. But I feel that in this
> specific case,
> community consensus may be a bad thing. Eventually,
> there may be
> groups of users vs other groups of users. Maybe
> Jimbo or some other
> person would have to step in there.
> 
> Oy, this is a whole new can-o-worms in Wikibooks
> policy...
> 
> --Dragontamer
> _______________________________________________
> Textbook-l mailing list
> [email protected]
>
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/textbook-l
> 


namespace Stanoz  {
/*
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------

How do you think Bill Gates got rich?
By being the smartest programmer in the world?
Or by owning the right to the work-product of other
programmers?
Your guess, I guess, is just as good as mine.

(Never mind...)

************************************************************
Stanley Ozoemena
STANOZ Computers (Nig.) Ltd.
20, Wetheral Rd., Owerri.
Imo State.
www.stanoz.com

0803 66 77 521
 083   232010

...er, from outside of my Nigeria; that'll be
+234 803 667 7521
+234  83  232010

Peace and Love.
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
*/
}

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.