Re: Wikibook User Arbitration

I agree with Dragontamer (although I'm sure everybody already knows my 
opinions on this matter). A user was blocked for misbehavior, and he 
complained about it. I can't imagine any user (besides a vandal) getting 
blocked and not complaining. This doesnt mean that every instance needs to 
become some kind of arbitration nightmare. What I don't see, besides Panic's 
plea, is a reason to review or even overturn SBJohnny's decision. People who 
make bold decisions to benefit the project should be rewarded, and I dont 
think we should be introducing unnecessary oversight into our system.

--Andrew Whitworth (Whiteknight)



>*Sigh* it was only a matter of time. Get a bunch of people working
>together, and people will suddenly not want to work together for
>whatever reason :-/
>
>I have not looked at the current issue (in fact, this is the first
>time I have heard of it. But I feel that in this specific case,
>community consensus may be a bad thing. Eventually, there may be
>groups of users vs other groups of users. Maybe Jimbo or some other
>person would have to step in there.
>
>Oy, this is a whole new can-o-worms in Wikibooks policy...
>
>--Dragontamer
>_______________________________________________
>Textbook-l mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/textbook-l

_________________________________________________________________
Your Hotmail address already works to sign into Windows Live Messenger! Get 
it now 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://get.live.com/messenger/overview