Re: [Foundation-l] Wiktionary, general thoughts

[Replies should go to <[email protected]>.]

Timwi wrote in part:

>Imran Ghory wrote:

>>there's not much that can be done about it,
>>becuase words in differnet langauges aren't reflective.

>(Two words are possible translations of each other if their meanings
>have a non-zero intersection; this property *is* reflexive.)

As a mathematician, I suppose that I should jump in here and say
that the word that you want here is "symmetric", not "reflexive". ^_^


-- Toby