Re: Ultimate Wiktionary and design decisions
Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.wikimedia.wiktionary |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
James R. Johnson wrote: >If there were an Ultimate Wiktionary, I'd like to have ang available in >Latin and Runic sets. > >James > > Hoi, If you want this old language, you can have it both with Runic sets and in Latin. When the UW is on line, you even have a user interface in either script the first thing to do is to localise the user interface. This is done by adding translations to words like noun or Nederlands or romaji. As to runic sets, if they have a UTF-8 characterset, there will be no problem. Thanks, Gerard >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Breen >Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2005 10:12 PM >To: The Wiktionary (http://www.wiktionary.org) mailing list >Subject: Re: [Wiktionary-l] Ultimate Wiktionary and design decisions > >[Gerard Meijssen ([Wiktionary-l] Ultimate Wiktionary and design decisions) >writes:] > > >>>For the Ultimate Wiktionary I have documented some of the design >>>criteria. It can be found here: >>>http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_Wiktionary_decisions_on_its_usage >>> >>> > > > >>>The Data design can be found here: >>>http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_Wiktionary_data_design >>> >>> > >I have added some comments to the Discussion pages of those two. > > > >>>One crucial decision is that only correct spelling is allowed. >>> >>> > >Fine, as long as you are going to cater for multiple correct spellings. >If you don't it's going to be difficult for some languages, e.g., >English, and impossible for others, e.g.. Japanese. > > Multiple correct spellings are possible it is however best to identify the spelling for the script that they use. Typically one way of spelling is more or less standardised in a orthography or it can be associated with a particular dialect. > > >>>This >>>means that all incorrect spelling will be amended or deleted. As >>>Ultimate Wiktionary is a database, it does not cater for things like >>>redirects. I urge you to have a look at both the design criteria and the >>>design itself because this is the time when it is relatively easy to >>>make changes. Once Erik starts coding the UW database, having finished >>>Wikidata and the GEMET implementation, the moment has passed us by. >>> >>> > >Indeed. > >Jim > >-- >Jim Breen http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/ >Clayton School of Information Technology, Tel: +61 3 9905 9554 >Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia Fax: +61 3 9905 5146 >(Monash Provider No. 00008C) @ >_______________________________________________ >Wiktionary-l mailing list >[email protected] >http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l > > >_______________________________________________ >Wiktionary-l mailing list >[email protected] >http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l > > >