Re: About this mailing list, was: Re: Two use cases for Wiktionary RDF

Cedric De Vroey <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.wikimedia.wiktionary
Message-ID <CAPfzsg6cpjiBDsROup-aMqRama+_6j7NybPp+NQU1nH5FY0mFg@mail.gmail.com>
Great idea! I'm pro. The bigger the knowledge-network, the more
opportunities.

Grtngs,
Cedric
Op 20-jan.-2012 17:00 schreef "Sebastian Hellmann" <
hellmann-jNDFPZUTrfTw9Zu3TmXbXSJk02hg1TJes0AfqQuZ5sE@public.gmane.org> het volgende:

> (I'm cross posting to dbpedia-wiktionary@lists.**sourceforge.net<dbpedia-wiktionary-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
> )
>
> Hi Thomas,
> interesting, that you posted on this list. It is the discussion list list
> for Wiktionary in general.
> I did a mail count for this list for 2011 and this is the result:
> 29 mails total
> 11 were general announcements such as the Wikimania
> 10 were about Wiktionary issues
> 8 were about information extraction of Wiktionary (Mostly caused by us and
> the Wiktionary RDF Extraction announcement).
>
> 2010 looks similar.
>
> I was wondering, if the extraction of data from Wiktionary could become a
> main topic on this list.
>
> Shall we merge communities into this list?
>
> 1. There is a DBpedia Wiktionary  to RDF list with 18 members here:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/**lists/listinfo/dbpedia-**wiktionary<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-wiktionary>
>
> 2. Then some people might join from http://linguistics.okfn.org/
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**listinfo/open-linguistics<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-linguistics>
> This is a Working Group for Open Data in Linguistics and there are maybe
> 5-10 people there that are interested in extraction of structured data from
> Wiktionary.
>
> 3. People from many approaches such as  http://code.google.com/p/**
> wikokit/ <http://code.google.com/p/wikokit/> (does not seem to have a
> mailing list) could be redirected here.
>
> In the end all want to get structured data out  of Wiktionary. If this
> would be possible, the number of Wiki editors would also increase.
>
> What do you think? I am not sure about all ramification, but focusing all
> efforts on Wiktionary-l would be nice and would benefit Wiktionary.
> Sebastian
>
>
>
>
>
> On 01/11/2012 03:50 PM, Thomas Schandl wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I recently found your very interesting projects as I was looking for
>> semantically rich dumps of Wiktionary, and I wanted to tell you about my
>> use cases.
>>
>> I work for the Semantic Web Company (we are also partners in the LOD2
>> project) and we have a term and phrase extractor, which we want to
>> improve by enriching the extraction model with their various grammatical
>> forms of the model's terms.
>>
>> So additions we are most interested in are declinations, tenses and
>> synonyms for German and English.
>> Another use case would be to use Wiktionary data to suggest translations
>> of controlled terms in a thesaurus. So the available translations would
>> be great to have in RDF, too.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Thomas
>>
>
>
> --
> Dipl. Inf. Sebastian Hellmann
> Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
> Projects: http://nlp2rdf.org , http://dbpedia.org
> Homepage: http://bis.informatik.uni-**leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann<http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann>
> Research Group: http://aksw.org
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Wiktionary-l mailing list
> [email protected]**org <[email protected]>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.