Re: [Wikitech-ambassadors] Would any other wikis like to try out a new search?
Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Nov 2013 15:53:00 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.wikimedia.wiktionary,gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical.ambassadors |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAO53wxX5DnuG7uc97DGpcKP5qHu323O-qAnt+r4OA2TE-45wDA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hoi,
When you are interested in more functionality out of search, try combining
sources.. like Wikidata and Wikipedia..
I actually blogged about it.
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2013/11/divcon-search-beyond-tail.html
Thanks,
Gerard
On 6 November 2013 15:41, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nikolas Everett, 06/11/2013 15:13:
>
>> Around that time I'm going to get hungry for more. I'll have new
>> servers with tons of head room and WMF folks will start asking me, "When
>> can we turn off the old search?" and I like to be able to answer that
>> with "When no one uses it. We're adding 6 wikis to Cirrus this week so
>> we'll get there eventually." What do folks think about adding _all_
>> wikisources and/or all wiktionaries as secondary? I've been told that
>> they really need template tranclusion and so the old search isn't really
>> working for them any way.
>>
>
> +1 This is more true for Wiktionary than for Wikisource, because many
> Wiktionaries produce tables of declension etc. via templates and that's
> actual if not the main content of entries. Additionally, with a similar
> "volume" it allows you to test in hundreds languages. So maybe Wiktionary
> first and Wikisource shortly after?
>
> Nemo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiktionary-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wiktionary-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l