Re: Do I need to move wget to crypto/ ?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Snaggle mentioned in IRC that he thought that the policy had been
relaxed such that packages that had in crypto/ were those that
*implemented* cryptography, but that wasn't articulated anywhere.

On 1/12/12 2:42 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
> It sounds to me like you should...
> 
> -- Dave
> 
> 
> On Jan 12, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> 
> wget doesn't use the system's openssl any more, because Leopard's 
> ancient version is missing symbols that the new wget wants, and 
> because I didn't want to have to make up a separate Leopard
> package. :-)
> 
> Since 'wget' now uses openssl100 and 'wget-gnutls' uses gnutls28, 
> should I move the wget package description to crypto?
>> 

- -- 
Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
Fink User Liaison
http://finkakh.wordpress.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk8Pe0YACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ8u9QCfSvaIV9RGL7SQGY+RKl7rqrFw
B9cAn2SWG/DHhXWKPQGJ1cfGSgLBnIG0
=5+DI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
_______________________________________________
fink-core mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.core
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-core