Re: Changing fink-obsolete-packages to RuntimeDepends

Sounds like a good idea to me!

  -- Dave

On Mar 28, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Max Horn wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> I would like to suggest to all package authors using
>  Depends: fink-obsolete-packages
> in an obsolete splitoff, that they switch to
>  Depends: fink (>= 0.32)
>  RuntimeDepends: fink-obsolete-packages
> instead. This way, building the non-obsolete package does not cause fink-obsolete-packages to be installed even though you don't use any obsolete splitoffs.
> 
> Example: My package "wireshark" has an obsolete splitoff "wireshark-ssl". In previous versions, whenever you updated wireshark, it would also install fink-obsolete-packages, even though wireshark itself is not obsolete.
> 
> In the new 1.6.6-1 release, I performed the change described above. Now, updating wireshark does not cause fink-obsolete-packages to be installed. Only trying to install or update the obsolete wireshark-ssl splitoff will do that.
> 
> 
> Any objections to me proposing that to a wider audience on fink-devel?
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Max
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF email is sponsosred by:
> Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
> _______________________________________________
> fink-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> List archive:
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.core
> Subscription management:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-core


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
fink-core mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.core
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-core