Re: selfupdate-git

Sjors Gielen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.apple.fink.core
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Op 31-07-12 15:22, Alexander Hansen schreef:
> We also need _written_ instructions and policies for maintainers, e.g.
> on the wiki.  People who don't use git currently may well find the
> learning curve formidable.

It's obvious that moving dists past CVS would be a good move for Fink. However, has anyone ever done a good analyis on SVN versus Git? For source code, Git is seen as the "next-gen" version control system and SVN is usually not even thought about anymore. However, this case is significantly different that I think it would be wise to make a rational decision between the two. (Even if Github supports SVN, we need to make a valid decision about Fink's new default VCS selfupdate.)

My thoughts pro Subversion:
* The learning curve of SVN is much smaller
* Since commits are linear, merge problems are easier to understand and solve
* Partial checkouts are easier (if at all possible with Git)
* The guide for Fink maintainers that are used to CVS, but not to SVN, would be easier

My thoughts pro Git:
* With its great branching support, experimental wouldn't be necessary anymore
* Local history

I think SVN wins for this purpose, as Git's features do not compensate for SVN's (for lack of a better word) robustness in the hands of less experienced maintainers. Your thoughts?

Sjors

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

_______________________________________________
fink-core mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.core
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-core
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 259 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlAX4s8ACgkQAZBOHH9jUAk+bQCfTdSI73m2wsqfLyPvZaU0h1l6
s6QAn2NjREKdVc64tIRe/qimnR1wE5IR
=WWWF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.