Re: selfupdate-git
Daniel Johnson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.apple.fink.core |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jul 31, 2012, at 10:12 AM, Alexander Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/31/12 6:51 AM, Sjors Gielen wrote: >> Op 31-07-12 15:22, Alexander Hansen schreef: >>> We also need _written_ instructions and policies for maintainers, e.g. >>> on the wiki. People who don't use git currently may well find the >>> learning curve formidable. >> >> It's obvious that moving dists past CVS would be a good move for Fink. However, has anyone ever done a good analyis on SVN versus Git? For source code, Git is seen as the "next-gen" version control system and SVN is usually not even thought about anymore. However, this case is significantly different that I think it would be wise to make a rational decision between the two. (Even if Github supports SVN, we need to make a valid decision about Fink's new default VCS selfupdate.) >> >> My thoughts pro Subversion: >> * The learning curve of SVN is much smaller >> * Since commits are linear, merge problems are easier to understand and solve >> * Partial checkouts are easier (if at all possible with Git) >> * The guide for Fink maintainers that are used to CVS, but not to SVN, would be easier >> >> My thoughts pro Git: >> * With its great branching support, experimental wouldn't be necessary anymore >> * Local history >> >> I think SVN wins for this purpose, as Git's features do not compensate for SVN's (for lack of a better word) robustness in the hands of less experienced maintainers. Your thoughts? >> >> Sjors >> >> >> > > Since github offers a svn<->git bridge, maintainers can in principle use > that. > > We talked about this two years ago when sourceforge said they were > discontinuing CVS (and lost momentum when they backed off of that idea), > and git edged svn out in those discussions. Part of the discussion was > colored by the fact that we were just coming off of a total CVS outage > at sf.net, and the idea of using a distributed VCS where it is easier to > mirror the distribution with different providers had a lot of traction. The selfupdate-git code in my branch works fine when I test it with my fink-dists conversion, but the selfupdate-svn code has stopped working the last time I tried it. Github's git<->svn bridge itself seems to have broken in some way because I can no longer checkout fink-dists with svn at all. The svn process just hangs. :( Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ fink-core mailing list [email protected] List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.core Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-core