Re: New openssl location
Max Horn <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:53:09 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.apple.fink.core |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, > On 26 Sep 2016, at 13:44, Daniel Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > There is a new OpenSSL libversion out, 1.1.0. I’ve made a new package but want to check with everyone else where I should put it, base or crypto. It does have a new BuildDepends, text-template-pm, so that would have to move to base too. Also note that not everything will be able to use it right away. There have been a lot of changes to the API (removed functions, structs made opaque, new threading model) so other packages usually need changes to work with it. Opinions? Why would we put this into base? The (naive) logical approach would be to put it into crypto, and thus also leave text-template-pm out of base. I don't say there are no good reasons for putting it into base/, but if there are, they should be named explicitly. Cheers, Max ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ fink-core mailing list [email protected] List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.core Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-core