Fink development work flow: pull requests? reviews?

Hi there,

so I recently had some time and motivation to work on a few small patches for fink. And since things are now on GitHub, I thought it might be best to submit them as pull requests, so that they can be reviewed and then merged (as opposed to just pushing them directly, as I would have in the distant past).

However, there was little reaction; only dmacks found some time to review them (thank you, BTW). Which leaves me wondering how to proceed?

Don't get me wrong, I am not complaining; everybody here is a volunteer, we all have little spare time, etc. etc.. I just wonder: Should I go ahead and merge my work resp. push directly, w/o care? Or are there any intentions to use pull requests systematically? I.e. should I wait more, and then "somebody" will review and merge those PRs? I've been "out of town" for quite some time and don't want to step on anybodies toes, as I have no idea how things are done now (it seems most development discussions still happen on IRC, like in the bad old days, i.e. completely intransparent to outsiders?)

Cheers,
Max
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
fink-core mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.core
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-core