Re: llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation
Alexander Hansen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.apple.fink.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging > that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib > validation because the install_names for shlibs all start with @rpath (or > on older darwin @executable_path or @loader_path). This was a decision by > upstream build maintainers that allows this package to be > binary-relocatable, even though fink makes no such guarantees about its > packages -- fink's remain in fixed install locations. > dmacks and akh began to look into a patch that would allow this to pass > validation. Can you guys comment on the status/issues/obstacles? > Such a fix would unblock llvm35 from hitting dists. > > Thanks! > > Fang > > -- > David Fang > http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Fink-devel mailing list > [email protected] > List archive: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel Since it’s the .deb validator that complains, I’m going to build this without -m mode (gasp!) so that I’ve got .debs to check against. -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel