Re: llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation
Alexander Hansen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.apple.fink.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Nov 13, 2014, at 8:50 AM, Alexander Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging >> that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib >> validation because the install_names for shlibs all start with @rpath (or >> on older darwin @executable_path or @loader_path). This was a decision by >> upstream build maintainers that allows this package to be >> binary-relocatable, even though fink makes no such guarantees about its >> packages -- fink's remain in fixed install locations. >> dmacks and akh began to look into a patch that would allow this to pass >> validation. Can you guys comment on the status/issues/obstacles? >> Such a fix would unblock llvm35 from hitting dists. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Fang >> >> -- >> David Fang >> http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ >> >> > > I’ve pushed something that works for me to https://github.com/fink/fink/tree/runtime_path <https://github.com/fink/fink/tree/runtime_path>. > And I’ve set up a formal pull request at https://github.com/fink/fink/pull/112 -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel