Re: Handling flat_namespace on 10.10+

Since this issue is so rare (only openmpi and libXt require
flat_namepace...with the latter being an historical artifact to keep
motif working), why not check the package name as they are processed
and if it skip the flat_namespace check if the package name matches
openmpi-shlibs_*.deb or openmpi_*.deb? Ugly but it will suffice.

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Alexander Hansen
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Apr 28, 2015, at 08:41, Jack Howarth <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Are the checks for the shlibs in Validation.pm done for the files from
>> all packages at once or as sets for each package and/or its
>> split-offs? If the latter, what about the idea of hard-coding a
>> blacklist into Validation.pm of packages and/or split-off which should
>> be skipped?
>>
>
> It’s the latter.  .info file validation is done as a batch, but the .deb validator works package by package—ideally only the root directories for the package family currently being built would even be available for validation during the build operation.
> --
> Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
> Fink User Liaison
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel