Re: OpenSSL vs. LibreSSL
Alexander Hansen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.apple.fink.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Jun 20, 2015, at 17:05, Jack Howarth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Alexander Hansen <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Fedora doesn't have a build dependency on OpenSSL for their cvs package but does build it against a MIT licensed krb5 which in turn is built against OpenSSL. >> >> Daniel > > > That’s kind of irrelevant unless they’re using an OpenSSL that doesn’t *come with the OS*. So unless you’re talking about binaries from an unofficial repository... > > > > It seems to be a moot point for cvs since we aren't linking in openssl anyway... > > /sw/bin/cvs: > /sw/lib/libintl.8.dylib (compatibility version 10.0.0, current version 10.2.0) > /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation (compatibility version 150.0.0, current version 1153.18.0) > /System/Library/Frameworks/Kerberos.framework/Versions/A/Kerberos (compatibility version 5.0.0, current version 6.0.0) > /usr/lib/libz.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.2.5) > /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1213.0.0) > > Also, since the Kerberos.framework is built against the system ssl package, any ancient darwin which still built the Kerberos framework against openssl would have used a system copy. > Which Daniel already mentioned, and fixed in CVS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel