Re: make-4.1-3 with make-default split-off

On 9/16/2015 6:09 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> On 16/09/15 11:43, Max Horn wrote:
> []
>> I am not 100% comfortable with changing the behavior of the make
>> package like this -- people who are relying on "GNU make" will be caught
>> by surprise if the "make" package suddenly does not provide gmake under
>> the name "make" anymore. Also, packages which depend on "make" would
>> have to be changed at the exact same time as this change is applied (for
>> this I'd need to know which packages are affected, though, which I don't
>> right now... do we have an effective way to do that?)
> []
>
> I agree with what Max says. Better than changing Fink's make package -
> as long as we do not really understand what is going on - might be to
> change the few packages that show this problem. If they don't have a
> dependency on the make package, for consistency reasons they should use
> /usr/bin/make instead of the generic "make". Not doing this is (at least
> in my case of cmake) simply a question of laziness of the maintainer and
> it would be trivial to fix.

The only package I find in the 10.7 tree that explicitly uses 
%p/bin/make is devel/po-debconf.info.  And indeed it does fail with 
/usr/bin/make from 10.9 (GNU-3.81).

Hanspeter


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools
in one place.
SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel