Re: Tested switching to new 10.9-libcxx tree
Alexander Hansen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.apple.fink.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Sep 25, 2015, at 10:26, Daniel Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:14 PM, Alexander Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> There are a couple of relatively minor hiccups: >> >> 1) You would have to use “fink selfupdate” twice: once to update fink, and once to download the 10.9-libcxx package descriptions. >> 2) The locally-build .deb collection gets orphaned (downloaded .debs from the bindist remain accessible), so we would need to handle that. >> Since changing distributions for an OS X version has been a rare occurrence, with only 10.2 -> 10.2-gcc3.3 and 10.4-transitional -> 10.4 before now, and because package rebuilds aren’t required for this transition, my thought was that we could just provide a run-once-manually helper script to move the .debs to the right place, reconstitute the /sw/fink/debs symlinks, and do a scanpackages to regenerate the local Packages.gz for apt. >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> If there are no objections, I’d like to switch the master fink branch on github over to using this tree in preparation for the 10.11 release. >> >> -- >> Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. >> Fink User Liaison > > That sounds fine to me. > > Daniel > I made the switch, but instead of a helper script I added some code to postinstall.pl. -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel