Re: box.info, box-0.2.2.info and box-0.3.4.info

Daniel Johnson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> On Sep 26, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Jack Howarth <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Daniel,
>       Is there any reason to maintain the box-0.2.2.info and box-0.3.4.info packaging in the 10.9-libc++ tree? I don't see any packages currently in the 10.9-libc++ tree with a BuildDepends on libboxcore0.2 or libboxcore0.3.
>             Jack

No, no reason other than they existed in the 10.7 tree when it was cloned and I haven’t gotten to removing them yet. I’m working on pruning pythonmods now.

Daniel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 801 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=mGKd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.