Re: Transition of packages from system-openssl-dev

Hanspeter Niederstrasser <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Organization Snaggled Works
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 10/18/2015 1:27 PM, Charles Lepple wrote:
> On Oct 14, 2015, at 5:19 PM, Alexander Hansen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> For people who want to test this out for their packages, but don’t always live on the bleeding edge and use git master, I recommend using branch_0_39, because you can then use “fink selfupdate” to get newer fink releases as usual.
>
> Should we hold off on committing updated info files? I saw that a few packages on the list on the wiki are crossed out already. Or should we commit them as "restrictive", then update the license field after 0.39.x+1 lands?

Either solution is fine.  If your stuff actually needs OpenSSL, the new 
License types should be in the next fink release (release date unknown) 
and it's up to you if you want to wait or mark them as Restrictive 
temporarily. Regardless of your choice, they won't be buildable on 10.11 
unless the system-openssl-dev BuildDependency is updated/removed.

Hanspeter


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.