proposed libxt and libxt-flat issues
Jack Howarth <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.apple.fink.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP5Ds0Ax0L+u_oAenZ4gQ9zrij=Or-8K5ZSuhrWhvjRxHpMiyA@mail.gmail.com> |
Daniel,
The proposed libxt/libxt-flat packaging in your experimental, which
places both in %p rather than buried subdirectories, would seem to require
either...
every single package building against Xquartz in fink have a BuildDepends
on libxt and a Depends on libxt-shlibs added (which is a real pain)
or
fink be enhanced to interpret the a BuildDepends on x11-dev as implying
both x11-dev and libxt and to interpret a Depends on x11-shlibs as implying
both a x11-shlibs and libxt-shlibs
The second approach, to automate the process, will require that libxt and
libxt-flat be allowed to co-exist by burying the devel files of libxt-flat.
The motif packages would then just prefix the path to this buried
libxt-flat directory (similar to what the currently proposed packaging on
tracker does).
Jack
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel