Re: boost1.63-nopython fails validation
Hanspeter Niederstrasser <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.apple.fink.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Snaggled Works |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/11/17 5:37 AM, Derek Homeier wrote: > On 11 Jan 2017, at 12:28 pm, Hanspeter Niederstrasser <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> + LIBDIR2= >>> + ./b2 -d2 'cxxflags=-std=c++11 -MD -I/sw/include' -j4 --without-python --prefix=/sw --libdir=/sw/opt/boost-1_63/lib --includedir=/sw/opt/boost-1_63/include/boost --compatibility_version=1.63.0 --current_version=1.63.0 --build-type=complete --layout=tagged variant=release threading=single,multi link=shared >>> Performing configuration checks >>> >>> - 32-bit : no >>> - 64-bit : yes >>> - arm : no >>> - mips1 : no >>> - power : no >>> - sparc : no >>> - x86 : yes >>> >>> Building the Boost C++ Libraries. >>> >>> >>> - symlinks supported : yes >>> - C++11 mutex : yes >>> - lockfree boost::atomic_flag : yes >>> - Boost.Config Feature Check: cxx11_auto_declarations : yes >>> - Boost.Config Feature Check: cxx11_constexpr : yes >>> - Boost.Config Feature Check: cxx11_defaulted_functions : yes >>> - Boost.Config Feature Check: cxx11_final : yes >>> - Boost.Config Feature Check: cxx11_hdr_mutex : yes >>> - Boost.Config Feature Check: cxx11_hdr_tuple : yes >>> - Boost.Config Feature Check: cxx11_lambdas : yes >>> - Boost.Config Feature Check: cxx11_noexcept : yes >>> - Boost.Config Feature Check: cxx11_nullptr : yes >>> - Boost.Config Feature Check: cxx11_rvalue_references : yes >>> - Boost.Config Feature Check: cxx11_template_aliases : yes >>> - Boost.Config Feature Check: cxx11_thread_local : yes >> >> The only difference in output is that my build doesn't find cxx11_thread_local. >> >> I wonder if it's a clang version issue (I have Xcode 7.3). Does the command >> >> /usr/bin/clang++ -dM -E -x c++ -std=c++14 /dev/null | grep thread >> >> output anything? >> > Nope, nothing. I think I have Xcode 8 on the El Capitan machine, but not the command > line tools (which are not available for 10.11 iirc); but I cannot connect to it to check right now. > The build difference is definitely due to thread_local_storage that didn't make it into Xcode until v8.0 [1]. Since 10.9 and 10.10 have no chance of getting Xcode8, the options are to either build the package differently for non-Xcode8 systems or disable the boost_fiber library everywhere. How criticial is boost_fiber for everyday usage of the Boost library collection? Hanspeter [1] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/11687 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] List archive: https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/mailman/fink-devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel