Re: texlive (luajittex) failure during install on 10.15

Sorry, I don't have 10.15 and I cannot test it, but --disable-luajittex
seems mandatory.

> Should we comment out the bad line in fmtutil.cnf in a Distribution:
specific texlive-texmf-10.15.info file (with a large %r bump), followed by
a Distribution: specific texlive-10.15.info file that Depends on the
correct %r of texlive-texmf and disables luajittex at buildtime?
> Or should texlive-10.15.info comment out the fmtutil.cnf line during
PostInstScript before the offending command gets run?

I support the first way, because I don't like touch/modify installed files.
(may be a matter of preference, so not a strong opinion)

Thank you for your continued effort.

Tomoaki Okayama

2019年12月7日(土) 20:49 Hanspeter Niederstrasser <[email protected]>:
>
> Tomoaki,
>
> Have you seen the texlive install failure report here?
> https://github.com/fink/fink-distributions/issues/490
>
> On 10.15, luajittex segfaults during PostInstallScript. luajittex can be
> disabled, but the file /sw/share/texmf-dist/web2c/fmtutil.cnf from
> texlive-texmf tries to run it even if missing?
>
> How should we fix this? Should we create 10.15 specific .info files for
> texlive-texmf and texlive-base that disable luajittex? Or is there some
> other way to avoid the luajittex failure? Might this be fixed in a newer
> texlive release?
>
> Hanspeter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fink-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> List archive:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/mailman/fink-devel
> Subscription management:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/mailman/fink-devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel