Re: Success and Failure in macOS Big Sur
Chris Schram via Fink-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.apple.fink.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Where the hell is Langlois, Oregon? |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2021-06-10, Daniel Macks <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/10/21, 3:09 AM, "Chris Schram via Fink-users" <[email protected]> wrote: > [slrn tries and tries, but eventually fails.] > > /opt/sw/src/fink.build/slrn-1.0.3-2/slrn-1.0.3/src/misc.c:376:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'VA_COPY' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > VA_COPY(ap1, ap); > ^ > 1 error generated. > make[1]: *** [/opt/sw/src/fink.build/slrn-1.0.3-2/slrn-1.0.3/src/objs/misc.o] Error 1 > make: *** [all] Error 2 > ### execution of /usr/bin/make failed, exit code 2 > ### execution of /tmp/fink.JvGdh failed, exit code 2 > Removing runtime build-lock... > Removing build-lock package... > /opt/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-slrn-1.0.3-2 > > I just pushed a probable fix for this one. It's same version-revision, but now during the build you should see: > > checking for an implementation of va_copy()... yes > checking for an implementation of __va_copy()... yes > > whereas during your failed build you probably saw those each as "no". I don't have Big Sur, so if slrn is still failing, make sure you have the latest changes (/opt/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/net/slrn.patch is 820 bytes not ~300 bytes) and we can try some other ideas. > > dan Dan, That fixed it for Big Sur. Thanks for the quick turnaround. -- [email protected] is a filtered spam magnet. Email replies may be lost. You're better off replying to this newsgroup. _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] List archive: https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/mailman/fink-users/ Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users