Re: pango1-xft2-ft219-dev-1.22.0-4
"Laszlo Ladanyi" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.apple.fink.gnome |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Alexander Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 7, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Laszlo Ladanyi wrote: > >> Thanks for the info and the *very* fast response! >> >> > > <snip> > >> I guess I should have delved more into fink's details... :-( When I >> got to the point that it's dpkg based I assumed that there are >> Provides... >> > > We do have Provides; they just don't carry any versioning. Last time I > looked this was also true in Debian--e.g. there's no option for a specific > version: > > Provides: foo-2.3-8 It's not that versioning is the problem in this case, rather that I assumed that the -ft219 version of pango1-xft2 is compatible with the original pango1-xft2. In cases where compatibility is true debian can specify that even though this package is foo it provides bar since it preserves compatibility with bar. Does fink have the same kind of Provides field (for truly compatible packages)? As Daniel pointed out, these packages are not compatible :-( I think it'd be worthwile to point this out in the info field which only says "These packages link against fink's freetype219 instead of the freetype that comes as part of x11. They also have cairo support." Especially that there are pango1-xft2 and pango1-xft2-ft219 packages, but there is only a pango1-xft2-ft219-dev package (the corresponding non-ft219 package does not exist). Thanks, --Laci ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/