Re: [Fink-users] update/obsolete problems

Daniel Macks <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.apple.fink.gnome
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:04:49PM -0600, Stan Sanderson wrote:
> OS 10.5.5, PPC, Xcode 3.1.1, X11 2.3.1; Gnome installed (unstable  
> tree); legacy fink install, updated successfully until present  
> problem(s).
> 
> In attempting to update e.g., bug-buddy 2.20.1-5, I am warned that  
> BuildDepends and preferred Depends are obsolete; the update fails. The  
> offending files are gaile18-dev and libgnomeui2.
> 
> Current pending updates--
> (i)  gnome-panel            2.20.3-4
> (i)  gnome-panel-dev        2.20.3-4
> (i)  gnome-panel-shlibs     2.20.3-4
> (i)  gnome-session          2.20.3-3
> (i)  gnome-utils            2.20.0.1-4
> (i)  gnome-utils-shlibs     2.20.0.1-4
> (i)  libnautilus-ext1-dev   2.20.0-3
> (i)  libnautilus-ext1-shli  2.20.0-3
> (i)  nautilus               2.20.0-3
> 
> If past experience informs, the warnings are only that; however, I  
> don't know what to do other than wait...

Right, the warnings are only warnings...they're only solveable by the
maintainer (fix his package to depend on the non-obsolete replacement
package(s). However, there isn't even a functional problem...obsolete
packages will continue to work indefinitely, they're just well,
obsolete. Unless you have a failure, you don't have a problem at all.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[email protected]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.