Re: [Fink-devel] libgda3 vs libgda4 (conflict)
Alexander Hansen <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:35:14 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.apple.fink.gnome |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Alexander > Hansen<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: >> >>> Both gnome/libgda.info and gnome/libgda-3.1.5.info provide "libgda" package. >>> Something should be done to distinguish those. >>> >>> >>> >> (Let's not crosspost here. One list is enough.) >> >> (Provides has a special meaning in a Debian-style packaging system. >> libgda is in the "family" of these two .info files in fink's nomenclature) >> >> (This would be in the unstable tree) >> >> That's not really necessary. As the situation stands, we have: >> >> libgda, libgda4-dev and libgda4-shlibs from the older libgda-3.1.5.info >> libgda, libgda4.0.4-dev and libgda4.0.4-shlibs from the newer libgda.info >> >> libgda-3.1.5 is still accessible to fink: >> >> fink dumpinfo -fallversions libgda >> Information about 9155 packages read in 2 seconds. >> allversions: >> 3.1.5-3 >> b 3.1.5-5 >> 4.0.2-2 >> >> (3.1.5-3 is the stable tree's libgda) >> >> and one can install it, if needed via >> >> fink install libgda-3.1.5-5 >> >> >> So we _could_ get rid of the 'libgda' package in 3.1.5-5, but it's not really necessary. >> > > As long, as they have the same name it is not possible to install both > of them at the same time. But it is possible to make them available at > the same time if we give different names to them. Files of these > packages do not conflict. Only info-files do. > > Ah; hadn't actually checked the contents. The DocFiles conflict, but that would be fixed with a name change, too. -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison ------------------------------------------------------------------------------