Re: Idea: each FAQ as its own xml file

On 2004/08/17, at 9:18, Daniel Macks wrote:

> I just looked at our translations of the Fink FAQ, and it looks like
> some languages have fallen behind. In trying to sort it all out, I
> became frustrated with the current source (.xml) file layout: each FAQ
> entry is really a self-contained item that may be changed (or added or
> removed), but we only have a single source file for the whole
> FAQ. Would it be better to have each as a separate file (which the
> build system joins together)? That way when committing a change, it is
> clear which FAQ item was updated and one could note that "this
> corresponds to english rev 1.38" to make it easy to keep things in
> sync. This cannot be done now, because a single new revision could
> involve many changed FAQs. It might be easy for some to be translated
> quickly, but not others, but keeping track of corresponding revision
> numbers requires knowing that they are all done.

You can go ahead if you have any idea to implement that.  Please bear 
in mind that News has the same problem.

--
BABA Yoshihiko

"You can take my freedom but you can't take my beer!!" by aarkzoo

Town Planner (Kyoto Center for Community Collaboration)
Support, Translation and Documentation Team, Fink Project 
(http://fink.sourceforge.net)



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285