Re: discussion / voting

Linh Pham <[email protected]> Sun, 9 Feb 2003 10:21:35 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.os.bsd.advocacy
Organization closedsrc.org
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2003-02-09 03:47 -0700, "Anthony C. Chavez" <acc-XvSzoi6dgTOSihdK6806/[email protected]> wrote:

# And in order to keep things from getting too hectic around here, we need
# to make sure that everyone submits a vote before we do anything major or
# make big decisions.  Not that I'm complaining for getting my way, but
# the core should all have gotten a vote as to which DB to use.  I have no
# idea if that happened or not, but for the record, I would have been
# perfectly happy using Berkeley DB rather than PostgreSQL.

Although I may not be part of the core team, but I think that the
decision of which database to use along with which codebase the sites
should use is up to the core member in charge of the technical aspect of
the team... along with the people helping out.

I personally don't think that the core team should be innundated with
votes on every little thing... or else we could end up the same way that
the FreeBSD core team has been over the past several months.

That's just my 0.01 USD.

-- 
Linh Pham                                [email protected]
Webmaster and FreeBSD Geek                          http://closedsrc.org
Apprentice Manager Editor and Writer           http://www.daemonnews.org
Courage: The things I do for love | And So Western Civilization Crumbles
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+RpwuwhofDeWkDMIRArRPAKCwd4SnIUjs9A6KrCSzg/sKXApWgACfbAHQ
qA28iuyoh/NsOvifLu5bTcc=
=4DVH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----