Re: discussion / voting
Linh Pham <[email protected]> Sun, 9 Feb 2003 10:21:35 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.bsd.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Organization | closedsrc.org |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2003-02-09 03:47 -0700, "Anthony C. Chavez" <acc-XvSzoi6dgTOSihdK6806/[email protected]> wrote: # And in order to keep things from getting too hectic around here, we need # to make sure that everyone submits a vote before we do anything major or # make big decisions. Not that I'm complaining for getting my way, but # the core should all have gotten a vote as to which DB to use. I have no # idea if that happened or not, but for the record, I would have been # perfectly happy using Berkeley DB rather than PostgreSQL. Although I may not be part of the core team, but I think that the decision of which database to use along with which codebase the sites should use is up to the core member in charge of the technical aspect of the team... along with the people helping out. I personally don't think that the core team should be innundated with votes on every little thing... or else we could end up the same way that the FreeBSD core team has been over the past several months. That's just my 0.01 USD. -- Linh Pham [email protected] Webmaster and FreeBSD Geek http://closedsrc.org Apprentice Manager Editor and Writer http://www.daemonnews.org Courage: The things I do for love | And So Western Civilization Crumbles
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+RpwuwhofDeWkDMIRArRPAKCwd4SnIUjs9A6KrCSzg/sKXApWgACfbAHQ qA28iuyoh/NsOvifLu5bTcc= =4DVH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----