RE: date of meeting
"Stacy Olivas" <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Feb 2003 06:16:29 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.bsd.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <012201c2d255$e6e362f0$0502000a@sentinel> |
<snip> > <soapbox> > Considering that a lot of people in the group (core or not) don't live > in the same time zone as everyone else, posting a meeting time in IRC > isn't going to help mostly when the time hasn't been discussed > beforehand. I think if a meeting needs to be scheduled, send a message > to the mailing list with an idea and what needs to be covered in the > meeting. If people can't make it, it can be discussed in the mailing > list until a time that works for all required people is figured out. > > At that point, the meeting organizer should send out a confirmation > message with the agreed meeting time, place, and a TODO list that is > agreed upon. Be it IRC for discussion and voting via e-mail or > website... whatever, but there needs to be a group agreement. Or else > more chaos will occur. Also, note if a meeting should include > ALL group > members, or just core members only. > > Things need to be more coordinated and handled as professionally as > humanly and geekly possible. Confusion sucks and we don't need anymore > of it... mostly when we are supposed to be unconfusing and > educating the > masses! > </soapbox> > I agree, since we all don't live in the same timezone, it is hard to set a time for us to all get together... The time was only meant to be tenative and not a firm date. It's purpose was to generate a discussion on when we could all get together.. Sorry if it looked like it was set in stone. :) Yes, we need to set the date, and then a TODO will be sent out so that we can all know what is going on (and not get blindsided at the meeting).. I too hate confusion.. sorry.. /me begs for forgiveness. -Stacy