Re: Project status

Anthony C. Chavez wrote:

>We should leave it open-ended and let people work on it as time permits.
>
>As I understand it, we have both bsdevents.org and bsdadvocacy.org.  I
>propose that we distribute this project among those two domains as their
>names entail: 1) have bsdevents.org host a database of advocacy events
>and 2) have bsdadvocacy.org host a clearinghouse of advocacy resources.
>
>It ~is~ possible to over-plan, which is what may have caused us to drift
>apart.  So, rather than trying to do cheerleading, I say that we make
>sure that every CORE member have accounts on the two machines and start
>whipping something together.  At this point, ~anything~ is better than
>nothing.
>
>So would the sysadmins for each domain please step forward and identify
>yourselves so we can request accounts?  In the interest of security, I
>would suggest arranging to meet on IRC (rather than through e-mail) to
>do it.
>
I'm the admin of bsdevents.org, and as I recall, bsdadvocacy.org was 
supposed to be pointed to the bsdevents.org machine (it's fast enough 
and on dual T1's - it can handle it..:D).  

I'd be more that happy to give people accounts on the machine - I was 
thinking of setting up cvs for checking out stuff for people to work 
on..  Anyone have any comments?

Eric