Re: raw socket, IP_HDRINCL byteorder
Bill Fenner <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:49:26 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.bsd.api.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>Yah, both input and output should deal with fully assembled packets. I'm not sure I buy requiring full packets on output. This restriction would have meant that e.g. http://www.martnet.com/~johnny/exploits/microsoft/win95ping.c would have to use BPF when raw sockets would do. Pros: - Symmetry - packets get reassembled on input, so full packets on output make sense. Cons: - Prevents certain useful uses of raw sockets (e.g. testing other systems' reassembly behavior). Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- The BSD APIs Discussion Mailing List To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe bsd-api-discuss" to majordomo-DZEk9q7Sfju/3pe1ocb+swC/[email protected]