Re: libgit2

On 26/05/2025 19:41, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Sun, 25 May 2025, Jon Turney wrote:
> 
[...]
> 
> Should I add a big comment documenting the test failures, or a separate
> file?
No wrong answers.

I guess I'd go for a separate file, but I don't mind.

> PKG_NAMES="git2 libgit2_1_9 libgit2-devel"

Sorry for not spotting this earlier, but I think the conventional name 
here is "libgit2_1.9" (i.e. the underscore just separates the upstream 
name (when it happens to end in digits) from a trailing soversion 
number, it doesn't replace all the dots in it.

If we're going to package the 'git2' tool, maybe it should have a 
description which makes it clearer what it's use is (debugging libgit2, 
not working with git repor?)

Thanks.