Re: [ITA] llvm

On 04/05/2025 07:59, ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps writes:
>> I pushed current working files in the packages
>> llvm
> 
> Thereby obliterating all the work I'd done two years ago in getting the
> packaging halfway up to speed and making it a mess again.  Not
> impressed… :-(
Hmm... maybe this could be arranged better.

The idea of playground branches was all a bit ad-hoc after I initially 
had things configured to only allow pushes to master (or main, I guess, 
now).

Perhaps it's possible to give every maintainer a branch only they can 
create, push, force-push, rewind and delete?

Or maybe I just need to allow branches named 'topic/*' which is the 
convention used elsewhere on sourceware for volatile, personal branches?