Re: [ITA] llvm

On Tue, 22 Jul 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Jun 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > I pushed update to 20.1.7 and synced patches with upstream, current
> > test results:
> > llvm:
> > Total Discovered Tests: 65227
> >   Skipped          :    52 (0.08%)
> >   Unsupported      :  2197 (3.37%)
> >   Passed           : 62757 (96.21%)
> >   Expectedly Failed:   193 (0.30%)
> >   Failed           :    28 (0.04%)
> >
> > clang:
> > Total Discovered Tests: 46308
> >   Skipped          :     8 (0.02%)
> >   Unsupported      :   181 (0.39%)
> >   Passed           : 46069 (99.48%)
> >   Expectedly Failed:    31 (0.07%)
> >   Failed           :    19 (0.04%)
> >
> > lld:
> > Total Discovered Tests: 1066
> >   Unsupported:   10 (0.94%)
> >   Passed     : 1056 (99.06%)

I went back to the "playground" branch (20.1.8), and backported more
(mostly test) fixes.  I removed the clang patch to call the linker
directly there, it was out of date, and probably makes more sense to
continue to develop against 21.1.

Current test results for 20.1.8:

llvm:
Total Discovered Tests: 65233
  Skipped          :    55 (0.08%)
  Unsupported      :  2200 (3.37%)
  Passed           : 62769 (96.22%)
  Expectedly Failed:   194 (0.30%)
  Failed           :    15 (0.02%)

clang:
Total Discovered Tests: 46308
  Skipped          :     8 (0.02%)
  Unsupported      :   192 (0.41%)
  Passed           : 46068 (99.48%)
  Expectedly Failed:    33 (0.07%)
  Failed           :     7 (0.02%)

Do you think it makes sense to deploy 20.1.8 to master soon and do at
least a test release?