Re: [ITP] python-calver/pretend/pybind11/scikit-build-core/trove-classifiers distros
Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Apr 2026 15:23:00 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.cygwin.applications |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 04/04/2026 17:47, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: > On 03/04/2026 23:45, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote: >> On 2026-03-31 08:51, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps wrote: >>> pretend (https://pypi.org/project/pretend/) is a dependency of >>> calver's tests, which is a new indirect dependency of a package I >>> maintain, and as such I'd like to package it for Cygwin. >>> The cygport file for this package is at: https://gitlab.com/hamishmb/ >>> cygwin- python-pretend >>> pretend is in Debian: https://packages.debian.org/trixie/python3-pretend >>> This, together with some other packages I've submitted ITPs for, will >>> enable me to release the current version of python-imaging for Python >>> 3.12 as stable, and start working on wxPython for Python 3.12. >> >> Hi Hamish, >> >> Concise distro info summary is available as Repology.org badges: >> >> https://repology.org/project/python%3Acalver/badges >> https://repology.org/project/python%3Apretend/badges >> https://repology.org/project/python%3Apybind11/badges >> https://repology.org/project/python%3Ascikit-build/badges >> https://repology.org/project/python%3Ascikit-build-core/badges >> https://repology.org/project/python%3Atrove/badges >> https://repology.org/project/python%3Atrove-classifiers/badges > > I've applied a bit of polish to the text under [1], which attempts to > describe our process for what is "an acceptable package". > > I think these package proposals are all already accepted under the > "requirement of an existing package" rule, but the text there asked > people to "mention" if the new package is already included in a major > Linux distribution, rather than clearly stating that is an alternative > which also makes a package acceptable. > > [1] https://cygwin.com/packaging-contributors-guide.html#submitting > > Cheers both, that looks like a useful website and an worthwhile addition to the docs. Best, Hamish