Re: [PATCH v2] Cygwin: Ensure unused fd available for open()

On 6/7/2026 11:29 AM, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 07/06/2026 08:54, Mark Geisert wrote:
[...]
> 
> Thanks. Yes, that all makes sense.
> 
> Thanks for looking into this. I pushed the patch.
> 
> Is this a candidate for 3.6 branch as well?

If Christian routinely runs his stress-ng tests against 3.6.x then yes, 
otherwise I don't think it's necessary.  Unless we want to burn it in 
"against" the part of the user base that updates... I can't decide if 
that's worth it.

..mark