Re: [PATCH] Cygwin: pty: detect pcon-backed pty for non-Cygwin-spawned children
Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Jun 2026 10:38:50 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.cygwin.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Takashi, On Fri, 29 May 2026, Takashi Yano wrote: > On Thu, 28 May 2026 15:48:24 +0200 (CEST) > Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Hi Takashi, > > > > On Tue, 5 May 2026, Takashi Yano wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 15:04:04 +0000 > > > "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" wrote: > > > > From: Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/dtable.cc b/winsup/cygwin/dtable.cc > > > > index 7303f7eac..ce29f4608 100644 > > > > --- a/winsup/cygwin/dtable.cc > > > > +++ b/winsup/cygwin/dtable.cc > > > > @@ -327,7 +327,17 @@ dtable::init_std_file_from_handle (int fd, HANDLE handle) > > > > dev.parse (myself->ctty); > > > > else > > > > { > > > > - dev.parse (FH_CONSOLE); > > > > + /* Check whether the inherited console is actually a pseudo > > > > + console bridging a pty. This happens when our non-Cygwin > > > > + parent was itself spawned by a Cygwin process from a pty > > > > + (e.g. bash spawning git.exe which then spawns vim). In > > > > + that case, connect to the pty slave instead of treating > > > > + the handle as a real console. */ > > > > + int pcon_minor = cygwin_shared->tty.find_pcon_pty (); > > > > + if (pcon_minor >= 0) > > > > + dev.parse (FHDEV (DEV_PTYS_MAJOR, pcon_minor)); > > > > + else > > > > + dev.parse (FH_CONSOLE); > > > > CloseHandle (handle); > > > > handle = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE; > > > > > > The lines: > > > CloseHandle (handle); > > > handle = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE; > > > are dropped in master branch. Do you think that these two lines > > > are necessary for this patch when applying this patch to cygwin > > > master branch? > > > > Those two lines are not necessary, all added code ignores the handle > > entirely. > > OK. I think this patch is not a bug fix but a behavioral change, > so it should go only to the master branch. What do you think? Seeing as this fixes a regression in Git for Windows, where `git commit`'s spawning a `vim` that will clear the screen after exiting instead of restoring the previous non-alternate screen, I would characterize it as a bug fix. But I can make that bug fix downstream-only, in Git for Windows' fork of the MSYS2 runtime, if you want to keep the commit in Cygwin's `master` only and not backport it to `cygwin-3_6-branch`. Either solution is fine for me. > If so, the patch does not apply to master branch due to these > two lines. Could you please update the patch for master branch? > > In addition, I would appreciate it if you could consider incorporating > the two additional patches I posted earlier. Sorry, I could not find the time to finish the analysis and validation via those AutoHotKey-based tests earlier. Ciao, Johannes