Re: [PATCH v3] Cygwin: pty: Do not transfer input to nat-pipe while masked
Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Jul 2026 12:44:01 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.cygwin.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Takashi,
Thank you for v3. Reverting the shared storage cleanly closes the
cross-process HANDLE hazard, and wrapping the CreateEvent/CloseHandle
block in acquire_attach_mutex/release_attach_mutex closes the
OpenEvent-based TOCTOU I had flagged on v2. One substantive concern
remains, around lock ordering.
On Mon, 6 Jul 2026, Takashi Yano wrote:
> On the command "cat | non-cygwin-app", `cat` sometimes fails to read
> key input. This happens when `cat` starts to read input before `non-
> cygwin-app` configures pseudo console. This is because pipe state is
> switched to nat-pipe when pseudo console is configured.
>=20
> This patch prevent the pipe state from changing to nat-pipe state if
> some cygwin process is reading input from the cyg-pipe.
>=20
> Fixes: f20641789427 ("Cygwin: pty: Reduce unecessary input transfer.")
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Yano <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2: Release all masks owned by myself on cleanup()
> v3: Reverts the change that made num_reader and slave_reading shared
>=20
> winsup/cygwin/fhandler/pty.cc | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/fhandler/pty.cc b/winsup/cygwin/fhandler/pty.=
cc
> index ca85ae679..963f95801 100644
> --- a/winsup/cygwin/fhandler/pty.cc
> +++ b/winsup/cygwin/fhandler/pty.cc
> @@ -1282,6 +1282,10 @@ fhandler_pty_slave::open_setup (int flags)
> void
> fhandler_pty_slave::cleanup ()
> {
> + fhandler_pty_slave *arch =3D (fhandler_pty_slave *) archetype ? : thi=
s;
> + while (arch->num_reader)
> + mask_switch_to_nat_pipe (false, false);
> +
> if (get_ttyp ()->pcon_activated && get_ttyp ()->getpgid () =3D=3D mys=
elf->pgid)
> req_fixup_pcon_state ();
> =20
> @@ -1543,19 +1547,22 @@ fhandler_pty_slave::write (const void *ptr, size=
_t len)
> void
> fhandler_pty_slave::mask_switch_to_nat_pipe (bool mask, bool xfer)
> {
> + acquire_attach_mutex (mutex_timeout);
> char name[MAX_PATH];
> shared_name (name, TTY_SLAVE_READING, get_minor ());
> HANDLE masked =3D OpenEvent (READ_CONTROL, FALSE, name);
> CloseHandle (masked);
> =20
> + fhandler_pty_slave *arch =3D (fhandler_pty_slave *) archetype ? : thi=
s;
> WaitForSingleObject (input_mutex, mutex_timeout);
> if (mask)
> {
> - if (InterlockedIncrement (&num_reader) =3D=3D 1)
> - slave_reading =3D CreateEvent (&sec_none_nih, TRUE, FALSE, name);
> + if (InterlockedIncrement (&arch->num_reader) =3D=3D 1)
> + arch->slave_reading =3D CreateEvent (&sec_none_nih, TRUE, FALSE, name)=
;
> }
> - else if (InterlockedDecrement (&num_reader) =3D=3D 0)
> - CloseHandle (slave_reading);
> + else if (InterlockedDecrement (&arch->num_reader) =3D=3D 0)
> + CloseHandle (arch->slave_reading);
> + release_attach_mutex ();
The acquisition order here is attach_mutex first, then input_mutex.
Elsewhere in pty.cc the established order is the opposite: input_mutex
first, and attach_mutex only around the transfer_input call inside.
See for example setpgid_aux and cleanup_for_non_cygwin_app, both of
which do
WaitForSingleObject (input_mutex, mutex_timeout);
...
acquire_attach_mutex (mutex_timeout);
transfer_input (...);
release_attach_mutex ();
...
ReleaseMutex (input_mutex);
and the same pattern appears at the open_setup path as well as two
further sites in pty.cc.
Since attach_mutex is a per-process unnamed mutex, declared and lazily
created at winsup/cygwin/fhandler/console.cc:1012-1015 in cygwin-3.6.9 as
extern HANDLE attach_mutex;
if (!attach_mutex)
attach_mutex =3D CreateMutex (&sec_none_nih, FALSE, NULL);
this cannot deadlock across processes. It _can_ deadlock intra-process,
though: thread T1 in mask_switch_to_nat_pipe holds attach_mutex and waits
for input_mutex, while thread T2 in setpgid_aux (or any of the other
input_mutex-then-attach_mutex sites) holds input_mutex and waits for
attach_mutex. mutex_timeout is INFINITE on the normal paths (the 0-timeout
variants only appear on the GDB paths), so the resulting hang would be
hard rather than a graceful timeout. Threaded cygwin readers on a pty
(python with threads, tmux, gdb driving an inferior) are the plausible
triggers.
For the record, I had Claude check that no direct caller of
mask_switch_to_nat_pipe already holds input_mutex when calling it (the
read path even explicitly releases input_mutex before the
mask_switch_to_nat_pipe (false, false) call); so the risk is entirely from
a _concurrent_ thread in the same process, not from the caller itself.
Two possible shapes. The simplest is to swap the order inside
mask_switch_to_nat_pipe so it matches the rest of the file: acquire
input_mutex first, then attach_mutex around the CreateEvent/CloseHandle
block, and release in reverse. The interlock against transfer_input's
OpenEvent existence check should still hold, since transfer_input's
callers already take input_mutex before attach_mutex. If instead the new
order is required for some reason I am missing, it would be worth a
comment near the acquire explaining why, plus an audit that no
input_mutex-holding path can want attach_mutex from a concurrent thread.
Does the reasoning make sense to you, and does the swap sound right?
Ciao,
Johannes
> =20
> if (!!masked !=3D mask && xfer && get_ttyp ()->switch_to_nat_pipe)
> {
> @@ -4460,6 +4467,18 @@ fhandler_pty_slave::transfer_input (tty::xfer_dir=
dir, HANDLE from, tty *ttyp,
> HANDLE input_available_event,
> HANDLE input_transferred_to_cyg)
> {
> + if (dir =3D=3D tty::to_nat)
> + {
> + char name[MAX_PATH];
> + shared_name (name, TTY_SLAVE_READING, ttyp->get_minor ());
> + HANDLE masked =3D OpenEvent (READ_CONTROL, FALSE, name);
> + CloseHandle (masked);
> + if (masked)
> + /* Cygwin process is reading cyg-pipe.
> + Do not transfer input to nat-pipe. */
> + return;
> + }
> +
> HANDLE to;
> if (dir =3D=3D tty::to_nat)
> to =3D ttyp->to_slave_nat ();
> --=20
> 2.51.0
>=20
>=20