Re: [EXTERNAL] Cygwin /usr/bin/clang with Windows Aarch64 support?

Sebastian Feld via Cygwin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.cygwin
Message-ID <CAHnbEGJAnxnQ3SbrbSvnAidk4sKUAnn0OQf+_U8jgDxxbLXh2A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 7:12 PM Jeremy Drake <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2025, Radek Barton via Cygwin wrote:
>
> > Hello Sebastian.
> >
> > AFAIK, LLVM has no *-pc-cygwin targets support and there is no-one trying to change that.
>
> We're working on that.  LLVM 21.x should be much better in that regard.
> There has been no effort towards aarch64-pc-cygwin though, but also
> nothing that would actively prevent that.

But recently there came in a flurry of commits for aarch64 support in
cygwin1.dll.

Did the status change?

>
> > Does Cygwin /usr/bin/clang has Aarch64 support, to compile native
> > Windows Aarch64 binaries if Cygwin-x86-64 runs on Windows Aarch64?
>
> I don't know about the old unmaintained version currently available, but
> we're working on getting LLVM/clang 20.x packaged that has all the
> architectures enabled, and can be used to cross-compile for
> aarch64-w64-mingw32 with https://github.com/mstorsjo/llvm-mingw
> ./build-all --host-clang
>

Did anything change yet?

Sebi
-- 
Sebastian Feld - IT security consultant

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.