Re: 3.0.3 and 3.2 releasing

On 8/24/2012 16:50, Sascha Wildner wrote:
> It really should get all the time it needs (in master) but I still think
> nothing should block us from updating our ISOs with fixes that have been
> in the branch for months now, some of them important.


After months, a few more days is insignificant.


> And I still don't
> see why that should depend on unfixed issues. It's not like rolling a
> new ISO is a huge amount of work (most of the time spent is waiting
> until it's built and uploading it), that can't be done again as new
> (important) fixes come in.


If the unfixed issues weren't actively being worked, I'd agree.


> But I guess we can only agree to disagree here.


I guess so.

John