Re: 3.2 build status

On 21 okt 2012, at 11.53, John Marino wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 11:40, Max Herrgard wrote:
>> On 21 okt 2012, at 04.41, Justin Sherrill wrote:
>>>  I don't want to
>>> hold up the release for packages; it's just too finicky.  Anyone have
>>> a problem with releasing without binary packages available?
>> Hrm yeah I think we should hold it until packages are ready. What can it be? A few days more?
> Waiting until the packages are done only penalizes people that build packages from source.  I don't see anything wrong with cutting a release along with a promise to have packages uploaded within 2-4 days.  The users that want to wait can and the users that don't won't need to.

Well, as a source builder myself I've already checked out the 3.2 branch and built it together with pkgsrc source packages. The typical release iso usage for me is when I need something quick that I know is working. Binary packages included.


Max