Re: dynamic binaries in the root filesystem

Chris Turner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.dragonfly-bsd.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 04/03/13 12:46, Francois Tigeot wrote:

> There's no need for them in an unified / + /usr world.

IMHO 'unified / + /usr' world is the result of Linux systems
not having a 'real' build system and doing things willy-nilly
than anything else, and is not a good model to base anything
on.

I don't have any proof to back this up - other than the
existance of 'traditional' unices[1] (e.g. unices where those
with full sources can 'build the system') which don't do this

(e.g. all BSD's, Solaris, probably HPUX & AIX still, etc)


.. [1] Recall UNIX: originally, a 9 track tape containing source
and binaries for a self hosting operating system. This was
always the case until commercial unices started keeping the
source code to themselves, and later (mis-)codified in
posix imho by falsely defining 'unix' as a simple 'trademark'
to a 'program specification'.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.